Access our Portals! Diabetes Portal
Obesity Portal
Cancer Portal
Portada Espanol
Access our Portals! Diabetes Portal
Obesity Portal
Cancer Portal
Portada Espanol
| « | February 2012 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | |||
Empire State Medical Association (ESMA) Recommendations to Reduce Health Disparities
Rationale: Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are the middle men of medicine.
HMOs deliver no health care and value interests of investors, shareholders, and executive compensation more disproportionately than those of patients. Revenues that could be directed to health care infrastructure is often used for corporate profit.
Legislation must be passed to make healthcare a basic human right – not a privilege. Over 45 million Americans have no health insurance. Countless millions more are incompletely insured and one catastrophic illness away from bankruptcy.
The concepts of referral use and capitation by HMOs discourage the physician patient encounter which delays access to health care. Health care delays increase costs by increasing expensive emergency room visits and hospital admissions for serious illness, leading to the closure of many hospitals.
In New York hospitals have lost approximately $750 million in the same year HMOs in the city have demonstrated over $750 million in profits. HMOs frequently cherry pick profitable healthy patients but leave millions - including the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions - uninsured. HMOs also often have prohibitive deductibles and patient out of pocket expenses, further taking money from patients to protect profits. Tighter regulation of HMOs and centralizing care to a few would contain costs spent on administration and allow patients and hospitals to thrive.
Existing government insurances should be expanded to allow New Yorkers to buy in. Expanding Medicaid, Child Health Plus, Healthy NY program and Medicare to insure all New Yorkers would be the ideal prototype for universal access to quality health care.
If every American had health care that emphasized preventive strategies and prompt and early care, then financing would be achieved through current systems. Considerations of single payer systems for public insurance (expansions of Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP) would be advised to ensure low overhead as well as patient share of cost at levels above poverty. Employers might anticipate decreased costs for workers compensation and disability plans/payments.
Single payer has been taken off the table in the national debate. The public option is one policy that would allow more insurance coverage for the working poor who do not qualify for Medicaid. The public option details have yet to be drafted --What do you see as important for the public option?
Single payer must be brought back into the discussion. This appears to be an early victory for insurance companies who have the most to gain from other plans they can make profits from.
A public option plan is a gap filling program which will essentially subsidize coverage for a certain group. This is not real reform. It is an extension of the present system which is essentially broke.
The 20% that we spend on paperwork in our present system is totally unacceptable and will continue under this system. Why not extend the Medicare model or the coverage offered to government employees? These operate at about 5% for paperwork.
Extending coverage for some will still leave us with a second class of insured....the poor and those covered by employer.
By removing the excess in administration costs a significant savings can lead to better care. The single payer model has been proven in most developed countries who enjoy good care. Unless we have a single payer Latinos will end up having access to second class insurance which providers will not accept. They will continue the present system of clinics and indigent hospital utilization of emergency departments. There is no better way for Latinos if we are to benefit from any reform.
How would you finance the system?